Monday 18 April 2011

#4- 'Alternate' Reality and Bashful Germans

I realized that I'm missing one of the mandatory blogposts, so here I go with the alternate one.
So much for the last post being the very last one on the blog. Errr.

As much as I love to write short stories, I don't think three paragraphs could really do Vonnegut's writing style justice, or that I could even come close to emulating the unrestrained purity of a master's conversationalist tone. I'll probably turn it into a private project that I'll work on over at least a few weeks, so here I go writing on the Alternate blog post allowed. As most readers of the Slaughterhouseeleven blogs probably haven't come across the alternate post too often, I'll post it here:


Kurt Vonnegut grew up in America and always identified with American culture. However, he expressed his sadness at the fact that his parents and grandparents were ashamed of their German heritage. Vonnegut claims that he did not grow up knowing many German recipes, children's stories, or customs. Examine Vonnegut's attitude towards Germany and the Germans in Slaughterhouse-Five. Does Vonnegut attack or defend his ancestry through his comments about all things German in the novel? More importantly, do you think that such attempts at assimilation and culture conformity are ever justifiable?"




Germany has a real self-hate problem since the second world war.
One one hand, I suppose being responsable for Hitler, the Nazis and 11 million extinguished lives (not to mention all the children and grandchildren that never came to be) is more than enough cause for some national shame. As a jew with family that was murdered in the war, I suppose I'm greatful for the fact that it hasn't been brushed off, and the responsible country isn't pretending it never happened, a-la Japan and the Rape of Nanking that it has edited out of its history books (Here's some information about it)

The problem that arises from this, of course, is that Germans aren't bad people. Germany has a rich culture spanning thousands of years, and one very short (though very terrible) period in it's history shouldn't be enough to negate everything else it has accomplished and celebrated. It seems kind of sad that in a culture that has given so much, young Germans who had nothing to do with the war or the Holocaust can't be allowed to feel a bit of national pride, even today. In Germany, it's not actually okay to wave or hang a flag unless it's a government building or something of that sort. They're all too afraid of showing national pride and becoming Nazis, apparently.

Evil Flag

 I don't think Kurt Vonnegut either attacks or defends his ancestry in the novel Slaughterhouse-Five, there's no doubt in my mind that Vonnegut, of all people, would have realized that people are only human. He would have taken his ancestry for something that was sad to lose, although Germany made some pretty bad choices fairly recently on the history scale. I don't think cultural assimilation is right, but it's certainly inevitable, as you are the product of your surroundings. Hopefully when brought to a new culture, though, you add something rather than completely re-moulding yourself to blend in.

-Ellana

#12-The End of two Children's Crusade

Having hacked and chopped this novel into bite-sized pieces, Slaughterhouse has delivered the last of its content(s), and so it's sad to say that Ellana and Ceci  are closing the butchery.

Ceci has already written what was supposed to be 'The End', so I'll keep this short :3

'Slaugherhouse-Five', or 'The Children's Crusade', continues to be one of my favorite novels though I've probably read it more times than should be considered healthy. Vonnegut is one of those rare authors from whose novels you can learn something new from each time you read one, and, even more interestingly, your depth of understanding and appreciation for each novel increases with each other Vonnegut novel you read. I think this speaks to the interwovenness of life as a whole, that everyone has a story completely seperate to those around them, though there's frequent cameos, even though you don't really need to know how anyone else got where they are.
The last phrase in the book, the sound made by the bird, 'Po-tee-weet?' has always reminded me of the Beatles song 'Blackbird', whose central message I think really applies to Billy Pilgrim, not the least way in that Billy, as well as the reader of the novel, already knew how the novel would end and were 'only waiting for this moment to arrive'




Blackbird singing in the dead of night
Take these broken wings and learn to fly
All your life
You were only waiting for this moment to arise

Black bird singing in the dead of night
Take these sunken eyes and learn to see
all your life
you were only waiting for this moment to be free

Blackbird fly, Blackbird fly
Into the light of the dark black night.



And so, we've come to the end of the end, although The End has already been written to it's end, it wasn't really the end of this blog. And that's the story.
The End.

-Ellana

#10-Reviewing Vonnegusto with Gus-...well, you know.

Alrighty! Let's get down to brass tacks!

So for my peer review, I decided to go with Vonnegusto.
I'm not actually sure whose blog it is, to be quite honest. Anyways, here's the link:
http://vonnegusto.tumblr.com/
Wow. I really, really liked this blog. It was funny and charming, without sacrificing content. The last post, titled 'Closure', was a bastardization of quotes from the novel to reflect blogging. It was fresh, cute and a perfect way to end a blog about a novel. I wish I'd thought of that :P.

One thing I like about Tumblr,  which this poster took advantage of, is that you can re-blog quotes, and the Nietzsche one which they chose fit the book very well, though I'm actually quite surprised that someone has evidence of Nietzsche saying something positive. I'll link to it, so you can know what I'm talking about.
I guess for once Nietzsche must have been having a good day.

Perhaps I'm obsessed a bit of a fanatic sucker for poetry and lyrics, but I like that the poster of this blog found a song that they felt fit the novel perfectly, and then had an entire post dedicated to explaining why. I was certainly convinced. I actually went and googled the song afterwards, and now it's probably going to be stuck in my head every time I read the novel 'Slaughterhouse-Five'. In addition to the lyrics being so perfect, I was surprised to find that the sound of the tune even seemed to fit the novel to a tee. Good job WriterofVonnegusto!

For the post entitled Book Banning, Burning, and other Words That Begin with B, I like how the author connected the ideas of book-banning to the novel 1984, I thought that was exactly right. I agreed with everything they had to say on the subject, though I found the last line quite tongue-in -cheek: "I’d really like to make a case for censoring (obliterating) censorship. If you don’t agree, I will censor your censorship. Seriously."
Not to mention the fact that the title of the post was really cute.

All in all, this was a good blog that was thought provoking and obviously well thought-out, though I still haven't a clue by whom :/

-Ellana

Sunday 17 April 2011

#2- Feeling and Living, but not necessarily in that order

"How nice-to feel nothing, and still get full credit for being alive"

I can't even tell you how much I love this quote.
I feel as if it sums up so much intrinsic to the human experience, in one simple, poignant sentence. Books are written based on that idea (actually, if you go back a few blog posts, 'Reality Check' deals with the same idea) psychologists are given hundreds of dollars based on that idea, teenage angst angst is based on that idea...
Leave it to Kurt Vonnegut to come up with the simplest, most mind-sticking and poignant way to communicate a complex human anecdote. I feel as if Vonnegut really had everything figured out, but didn't really mind enough to do much about it.

-Ellana

#3- Ban this Blog post!

Alright.
So I understand the motive behind banning books. But this doesn't mean I agree with it.
Some ideas really can be harmful. Some books are genuinely dangerous.
But who gets decide that?
Banning books is an absurd idea. We live in the information age, but people can still be censored? If you ban a book, it means that it contained something radical. Radical ideas are what force people to think, the things that point out flaws in the self and in society. Some ideas that were once considered radical enough to be burn-at-the-stake worthy ended up, years later, being pillars of modern knowledge, freedom and thought. Women's rights? Democracy? The Earth not being the center of the universe?

Letting anyone decide what anyone else gets to read, and consequently think, goes against every human sensibility and shred of morality I have. Thoughts and ideas are a precious resource, and the only things that can move us forward. I don't see how banning books is any different from suppressing knowledge or encouraging ignorance, two things which sound like bad ideas for a reason.
The reasons given for banning Slaughterhouse-Five actually almost make me angry. Of course war is innapropriate, for ANYONE. That doesn't make it any less of a reality.  Okay, there's some sex, but you know what else has that?
REAL LIFE.
What I find shocking and inappropriate, what I think SHOULD provoke strong responses out of people, is the fact that this book can be banned in certain States, yet in those very same ones young people in the are allowed to give up their lives for their country (age 18)  before they are even trusted enough to be  allowed to consume alcohol (age 21) because, apparently, that's too much responsibility . The people that decided this are not the people that should be deciding what I, or anyone else, should be allowed to think. That very thought scares me.
Rant over.

-Ellana